January 17th, 2011
As most of you probably know by now, Gabrielle Giffords was nearly assassinated last week by a lone gunman named Jared Lee Loughner. Thanks to his actions, the mainstream media has gone berserk by pointing fingers at every right-wing person imaginable, including Sarah Palin, who actually ”targeted” Giffords with her infamous map during her personal “Take Back the 20″ campaign during the 2010 midterm election cycle. Even one of the victims that survived his bloody rampage has been driven to blame Sarah! I mean what the heck? Remember folks, this is just one guy who caused all of this, not to mention that he also took away the lives of 6 people, including a young girl! Now back on topic. Jared Lee Loughner started to change for the worse back in 2006. His girlfriend dumped him, prompting him to abuse drugs and drink alcohol, which forced himself to drop out of school. Former friends often noted that he often kept to himself and has been described as insane. Based on police records, he also has a YouTube page, which gave officers a better look at who Jared really is. It has been noted that Jared has added Mein Kampf and The Communist Manifesto to his list of favorite books, labeling him as a left-wing extremist (so much for blaming the Tea Party). Even his fellow classmates noted how extreme he was, including his deep-seeded hatred towards Gabrielle Giffords due to the fact that she was a “blue-dog democrat”. As of now, he is charged with attempted assassination, two counts of killing a federal employee and two counts of attempting to kill a federal employee. If you look at his mugshot now, you would be very creeped out by his crooked smile, shallow stare, and a bald head that would make him right at home with a group of NeoNazi skinheads. The point of the whole topic is to better explain who Jared is, what he’s done, and why he is not only responsible for this sickening crime, but also for making the media aim it’s hatred towards those who weren’t involved in the crime itself. Like many conservatives say, liberalism is a mental disorder. May God help us all.
Glenn N.
Categories: Uncategorized
January 11th, 2011
Well let’s start with the video that inspired this post’s title shall we? I will dissect it after you view it. I hope you are not viewing this during dinner because it is nauseating:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiNCMk3qGzc
This is journalism? What kind of softball set up is “What is this about?” Was the question referring to the reading of the Constitution on the floor of the people’s house? Or ,as a dimly lit clown, Joy really wants to know what the Constitution is about? Second, Bill Press is still alive! Well I guess being on HLN, he might as well be dead. Also, the right to privacy is not in the Constitution, Mr Press! According to www.usconstitution.net – The Constitution does not specifically mention a right to privacy. However, Supreme Court decisions over the years have established that the right to privacy is a basic human right, and as such is protected by virtue of the 9th Amendment. The right to privacy has come to the public’s attention via several controversial Supreme Court rulings, including several dealing with contraception (the Griswold and Eisenstadt cases), interracial marriage (the Loving case), and abortion (the well-known Roe v Wade case). In addition, it is said that a right to privacy is inherent in many of the amendments in the Bill of Rights, such as the 3rd, the 4th‘s search and seizure limits, and the 5th‘s self-incrimination limit.
So it is the left’s love affair with the Supreme Court that assumes 9 non-elected people with black robes, not the authors of the Constitution, interpreted the right to privacy to be in there.
Then the slobbering buffoon goes on to say that only Congress can declare war (Article 1 Sec 8 for all you libs out there who care to look it up) as a slam against Republicans. I am assuming he is digging up his “it is all Bush’s fault” bone from his backyard. Was Bill Clinton a Republican? From www.fff.org : President Bill Clinton took or considered military action in Bosnia, Haiti, Korea, Kosovo, and Somalia — with nary a nod to Congress. This former state attorney general and constitutional law professor announced in 1993, “I would strenuously oppose attempts to encroach on the president’s foreign-policy powers.” Adopting a novel form of constitutional interpretation, he opined, “The Constitution leaves the president, for good and sufficient reasons, the ultimate decision-making authority.”
How about John F. Kennedy or Lyndon B. Johnson? Oh and before I forget, Bill Press and the condescending Joy Behar read this: Congress formally authorized the president to retaliate against any “nations, organization, or persons” he determined to be involved in the September 11. (Attribution again to fff.org) So you idiots can tell me what Republicans MAY not know what is in the Constitution, let me educate you on exactly what IS NOT in the Constitution. Right to Privacy-Nope. Separation of Church and State-Nope. Abortion-Nope. And lastly, Same-Sex Marriages- ah that would also be NOPE. So then they go to break.
Give me a break. Why all this hate for a document that has made people like Joy and Bill so rich? Why so much hate that has done more to show American Exceptionalism than anything else? This may be controversial, but what do I care. We are America because of our Constitution. No other country has anything like it. Most countries are ruled by fiat. One person rule and the rest follow. Though I have many negative things to say about the Congress it is better than living under the thumb of some dictator, military command, or theocracy.
Joy should just go back to “the narrow View” where at least the “victims of sleeping in” (Ted Nugent on Anderson 360) are watching and can worship you. In this format you are nothing more than a sock puppet for the left and it is embarrassing. Wouldn’t a better set-up for this segment have been “Boehner is reading the Constitution. It is about time. We all need to know what is in it and not confuse it with Supreme Court precedent. Bill do you like the fact that John Boehner will tell the public about freedom of the press and why we have jobs?”
If any of you members of the 111th Congress, that swore (to God by the way) to uphold the Constitution come on the Joy Behar Show and say that it is old and there is no way to show original intent. OR We can’t travel back in time…OR it is over 100 years old…anything to that effect should immediately resign…FREELY!
Categories: Uncategorized
November 14th, 2010
How many of you folks are familiar with Al Capp, the cartoon artist known for creating the Li’l Abner comic strips? Well, incase you don’t know who he is, that’s fine. Anyway, I saw a part of a documentary about Al Capp recently on YouTube, and at the end there was a particular quote from him that I found to be interesting, so I thought I would share it with you. This is what he said sometime during his lifetime.
“I’m always astonished when anyone calls me a conservative. I was once a champion of liberalism, until it got drunk from sanctimoniousness. If it ever sobers up, I’ll champion it again. I haven’t changed, not one bit.”
I am sure that Al Capp is an example of an American that can embrace liberalism from the Democratic party, but then realizes that it has gone too far to the point that it may be time to switch sides. That is what I get from this quote. What do you folks think?
Glenn Nahrwold
Categories: Uncategorized
November 14th, 2010
I have to admit I have not seen “the scariest film you will ever see.” That is a tag line from Al Gore’s film “An Inconvenient Truth.” But what I find interesting the deeper I dig and the more opinions I absorb, the only thing that is inconvienent is Al Gore’s presentation. The “hockey stick” is disproven. The oceans are not rising. If they were would the author of this documentary buy a home on the beach in California? Australia has had those curly q light bulbs for years, with no effect, so called green jobs kill economies, and I find a person that supports this fraud saying that if we stop driving cars, change our light bulbs, and covert to alternative energy we will have virtually no effect on “global warming”.
If the debate is over then why can I find this video so plausible: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWjGZNDEH-A&feature=player_embedded#!
Go EPA Go? Why would you let some non-elected group decide for you what you can and cannot do? Who is the EPA? Do you know who heads this evil group? You don’t? Then why do they have so much power? By the way, the leader is Lisa Jackson. Now you know. The Clean Air Act says that the EPA has to prove that CO2 is a pollutant with scientific evidence. They can’t just say it is. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124001537515830975.html
Why is it America’s job to save the planet? We are number three in land mass. Russia has more and I think Canada has more. The Cap and Trade scheme seems to target America. Why? Because believers like Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, and Van Jones will benefit finacially from this scam. How does allowing other countries that do not currently pollute to pollute, benefit the planet? If we in the US pollute less and then buy carbon credits from poorer nations to allow us to pollute the same, benefit this fraud of global warming? Libs your greed is showing. It is all about money. You can search the Chicago Climate Exchange, and find out the players. I think they are all Americans. Including the former head of Fanny Mae/Freddie Mac. It is a scam to make liberals rich, and get more of your money!
Let’s stop all taxation under the scam of saving the planet. I am sick and tired of paying for tunnels for turtles, money to find out why the chicken crossed the road, and anything that is similar to it. I am sick of hearing that I can save the planet if I would just stick and ear of corn in my gas tank. I am tired of hearing that I will get a tax break if I buy a certain light bulb, a certain toilet, or a certain air conditioner. Tax breaks is a phrase that the lib likes to use. What it really is: is money that they took from you to fund this fraud. I have an idea: How about we stop taxing the people in double digits because you have already spent the money on this stupidity and allow them to keep their money to do what they want with it. Ground breaking thinking!
I am sick of hearing that we are too stupid to make smart choices with our money. I am sick of hearing that a few elitists in Washington know better than we do. The dirty little secret is that these people that some of the voters trust stand to make more money that most of us will see in a lifetime because of “global warming.” How is that compassionate? How is taking the money of the average citizen and sticking it in their bank account going to benefit anyone but a liberal?
Like the video says “climate change” is all about government control. If you want the government to control you, move to Europe or North Korea. If you want to choose how you spend your money, move to America. The solutions to “man-made global-warming” do not benefit us they only benefit the elite. By the way, I thought this debate was over?
Categories: Uncategorized
November 13th, 2010
We the people have done well. We have got involved made a positive correction in our direction and seemingly have been rewarded. Unfortunately we cant relax or we will find ourselves back where we were. The left wont die. Like a disease they will advance if we give them half a chance. The conservative movement gained ground because we no longer had it. It taught us we must not tolerate the destructive nature of communism. Communism is like a vine that appears pleasing at a glance. Once the vine overtakes it strangles the life from the host. The lefts tenacity is likely stronger than ours as they know it has to be to regain their momentum. They have more practice in their movement. Their efforts are inversely proportional to their lack of control.
We have to stay on those elected to the conservative team. If they even try to dial back conservatism we must send them a clear message it isn’t going to be tolerated. DON’T LET COMPLACENCY KILL OUR REPUBLIC !!!
Categories: Uncategorized
November 8th, 2010
Folks, in the wake of the mid-term elections, there was a mighty tidal wave of voter anger that has switched the balance of power from the democrats to the republicans in the house! As Laura Ingraham put it, it was Pelosi’s last day to “stroke the gravel”. But, there were also mixed feelings for folks in other states, especially California, Delaware and Nevada. Boxer, Reid, and Coons have fended off the wave of change that swept the nation. How? It’s a mix of reasons, but there’s one person that some in the GOP have blamed for costing them a potential senate sweep as well. Who is it? None other than Sarah Palin. Why? Well, according to a recent hit piece from PoliticusUsa.com, which is sadly called “How Sarah Palin Lost the Senate for the GOP”, it basically explains how some of Sarah’s picks could have fared off better against their democratic opponents if she had not been “meddling” in the senate races in certain states. It also blatantly called Sarah’s involvement in the mid-terms as a chance for her to flex her “political muscle” rather than help aid the GOP and the Tea Party movement to overturn the liberal agenda. Guess what? Most of her choices have made it into the house and senate, with results still coming in from other states. Although this piece says that she may also cost Joe Miller a victory, the voting results from Alaska are just being counted as we speak, with full results by Nov. 10 or later. As for the title of my post, it’s just something that popped into my head after thinking about how some folks from the GOP still blame her for costing McCain’s ’08 presidential campaign. Personally, I think it’s useless to continue what I call the “Blame-Palin” game, which is probably just as annoying as the “Blame-Bush” game. Oh btw, incase you didn’t notice yet, George W. Bush has recently become another GOP elite who doesn’t see Sarah as a qualified 2012 candidate. Really? At least Jeb Bush thinks otherwise. Anyway, what do you folks think? Should Palin be spared from the negative political bashing from the right, or do you have some conflicting opinions against Sarah as well? Just curious. Personally, I’m a big fan of Sarah and what she’s been doing for America since this past mid-term election. I say PALIN 2012!
Glenn Nahrwold
Categories: Uncategorized
November 2nd, 2010
Warm fuzzies are those things that make you feel good inside. I would imagine they are related to a mone. You know…pheromones, or in some cases hormones. I do know we all seek the warm fuzzies though. The important thing is that all parties involved achieve the warm fuzzy. It should be mutual or it can be counterproductive and backfire on you. The last thing I want is to cause someone to get a cold or creepy unfuzzy in my effort to get a warm fuzzy. The warm fuzzy factor initially sounds sexual. It can be but it really isn’t. It is about teamwork. I can get a warm fuzzy by helping someone. It’s a teamwork thing. They get something they need and I get a smile. It could be fixing someone’s broken widget or a simple kind word. Being appreciated is my favorite way to get the warm fuzzy. I even prefer repairing someone elses broken widget over fixing mine. I wonder if that is a sign of co dependency.
We often hear being codependent is a bad thing. I think that belief stems from the communists. God wants us to be and work together. Needing someone’s smile, acceptance or approval is Gods way of saying be a team. The socialist governmental movement wants you dependent on them not one another. They don’t want any of us to depend on each other and they certainly don’t want us to depend on God. They want us in a little box. A box they have control over. When the chips are down they want us to reach out to them.
So my fellow warm fuzzy seekers today reach out to all people in these UNITED STATES, vote against the democratic socialized box before they prevent us from getting our warm fuzzies.
Categories: Uncategorized
October 22nd, 2010
Well folks, I have just witnessed one of the most unusual moments in the history of politics. On October 18th, 2010, NY got it’s first glimpse of one of the most unusual politicians to enter the NY gubernatorial race. His name is Jimmy McMillan, aka “Papa Smurf”, who is also known for his beard, reminiscent of what most men had in the 1800′s. Incase you haven’t noticed, he is already an internet sensation on YouTube, due in part to his affiliation with his own party, which is officially called the ”Rent is Too Damn High” party. You can’t make this stuff up folks. But, despite his party’s name, Jimmy himself is a registered member of the Democratic party, and guess what? He doesn’t pay rent for his own apartment! His landlord allows him to live there for free, as long as he maintains the apartment building! No fair! Anyway, in case you folks haven’t seen Jimmy’s unique debut, here’s the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4o-TeMHys0 What do you folks think? Personally, I think he’s cuckoo.
Glenn Nahrwold.
Categories: Uncategorized
October 20th, 2010
Willie Geist, in promoting his book, went on his employer’s network MSNBC to slam Republican hopefuls. (http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2010/10/18/sneering-msnbc-slams-gop-candidates-american-freak-show ) To be fair to Mr. Geist, he a satirist that has written a book called American Freakshow. And in it he skewers Sarah Palin, Blaggo, Tiger Woods and Snooki. It is a cleverly conceived book and I can read it. The problem arises when he goes on another show (other than the one that bears his name) and says that the book came out too early he wishes that he could have included Rand Paul, Christine O’Donnell and Meg Whitman. I infer, more conservatives. I think the banner on the segment was American Freakshow: Rand Paul, Christine O’Donnell, and Meg Whitman.
Now a humorist may be interested in a candidate that has to proclaim that she is not a witch, a candidate that was part of a group that worshiped “aqua Buddaha”, and a woman that has used the word “whore” to her advantage. But to say they are apart of a freakshow, only shows MSNBC’s bias. I don’t compare something that some one did when they were 16 or 19 to Lindsay Lohan or Tiger Woods. I think he was playing to the MSNBC audience and they interpret these candidates as freaks and should not be elected. Keep in mind the left is the compassionate, opened-minded, big tent party.
I support these freaks. Because none of these stories matter to me. I want limited government, less spending, and Obamacare repealed. I want Nancy Pelosi fired, Harry Ried defeated, and Cap and Trade no chance of passing. The only way this can happen is to have solid Conservatives in the House and Senate. For all of those that are going to vote for Chris Coons because Christine O’Donnell is now labeled a freak, let’s not forget that he once found Marxism better than Capitalism. He is a Marxist. He has been able to shed that by saying it was a long time ago. So was the witch thing. He will vote with Obama and work to keep Pelosi speaker and Ried, if he wins as Senate Leader.
Freaks aren’t exclusive to the GOP. How about Al Franken, drug user and someone who thought that “Stuart Saves His Family” was a good movie? How about Barney Frank? How about Allan Grayson? He hasn’t said a coherent thing in over a year. He uses fear tactics instead of reasonable debate. How about Claire McCaskill that claims she is a moderate, but votes time and time again for Obama’s policies? CRAZY! How about Maxine Waters? How about John Conyers remember this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bp1kjY3RwdM
Why is the left considered the compassionate party? That is freakish to me. Do they support the Constitution? No. Do they care what you think? No. 74% for Arizona law, 65% against the ground zero Mosque, 68% against healthcare, and 38%approval rating for the direction the President is taking this country. They want to take more of our money because they have already spent the money and without a tax hike they can’t say they have a projected balanced budget. They want to punish success and reward mediocrity (or less). Why aren’t they the freaks? I say it is freakish to give money that someone else earned and give it to those who didn’t earn it. Weather that be the less fortunate in this country or the government. The one thing that is fair in this country is that you have and opportunity to be great. ALL of US do. No other country can offer you that.
So if the left wants to paint the Tea Party as freaks, let them. If they want to paint every conservative that is leading at this point in the race as freaks (extremists), let them. They say there is something wrong with me, but never offer any facts. If they think that obstructing a Socialistic agenda, makes us freaks, who cares. I am going to let my freak flag fly.
Categories: Uncategorized
October 17th, 2010
I was checking out the latest polls this morning and although Obamas approval rating is dropping nationwide I am baffled that we still have a large number of voters that favor the Marxist agenda. I cant believe that roughly 45% are all communists. We must push harder. Who knows what tricks the opposition has in store in the way of voter fraud and intimidation. We need a much wider margin. This site is dedicated to the flipping of libs. While working in a 95 percent liberal workplace I learned it is possible to discuss politics with the misdirected when don’t correctly. It is possible to open some ears and minds with the proper opening lines. I remember ears would perk up when I open with,” I love My country and all Gods people. After doing my homework and not just listening to the talking heads and the bought and paid for media I learned the truth.”
This statement plants a seed whether you or the listener knows it. We must keep the political topic alive and well at the water cooler and beyond. We still have a job to do. we see the margin is growing and many may think they slow the message down. We cant. The liberals have gotten where they are today by persistence and pushing forward. This is evidenced through their playbook, “Rules for Radicals” by Sal Alinsky. It is also evidenced in the socialist winning battle I call “Health Care Deform”. Keep fighting the good fight, keep attending the rallies and tea parties. Keep using facts and polite presentations to get the attention of the misinformed. We are the new media. God Bless, Scott key
Categories: Uncategorized
